Revista Portuguesa de Pneumologia Revista Portuguesa de Pneumologia
Rev Port Pneumol 2017;23:221-4 - Vol. 23 Num.4 DOI: 10.1016/j.rppnen.2017.02.005
Brief communication
Parents’ educational level and second-hand tobacco smoke exposure at home in a sample of Portuguese children
Paulo D. Vitóriaa,b,, , Célia Nunesc, José Preciosod
a Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade da Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal
b CIS-IUL, Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), Lisboa, Portugal
c Departamento de Matemática e Centro de Matemática e Aplicações, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade da Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal
d Instituto de Educação, Universidade do Minho, Campus de Gualtar, Braga, Portugal
Received 28 November 2016, Accepted 13 February 2017
Related article:
Abstract

Second-hand tobacco smoke (SHS) exposure is a major and entirely avoidable health risk for children's health, well-being and development. The main objective of the current study was to investigate the association between parents’ educational level and children's SHS home exposure.

A self-administered questionnaire was conducted within a sample of 949 students in 4th grade (mean age 9.56±0.75, 53.4% male). The sample was randomly selected from all schools located at Lisbon District, Portugal.

The current study confirmed that Portuguese children are exposed to unacceptable high levels of SHS at home, mainly by their parents’ smoke. Prevalence of smokers was higher amongst parents with low educational level. Children of parents with low educational level were more likely to suffer SHS exposure at home. These results confirmed the social inequalities associated with smoking, support the relevance of more research on this subject and stress the need for more interventions to control this problem. Some interventions should be specifically aimed at less educated parents, particularly at less educated mothers.

Keywords
Air pollution, Health promotion, Parenting, Pediatrics, Poverty, Preventive medicine, Public health practice, Risk factors, Smoking, Tobacco
Introduction

Worldwide, about 600000 premature deaths per year are attributable to second-hand tobacco smoke (SHS), of which 28% are children.1,2 SHS exposure is a major and entirely avoidable risk for children with serious consequences for their health and development, including nasal, eye and airways irritation, middle ear disease, wheezing, cough and dyspnea, asthma and pneumonia, compromised lung function and growth, increased risk of sudden infant death syndrome.2,3 Furthermore, SHS exposure has been associated with increased risk of neurodevelopmental delay, low neurocognitive performance and poor academic achievement.4 Besides all these, children exposed to parents’ and siblings’ smoking behavior are more likely to start smoking in the future.2,5

Despite these consequences, more than 40% of children worldwide are exposed to SHS, mainly at home by parents, particularly in poorer families.1,2 Equivalent figures on children's SHS exposure were found in Portugal.6

Socioeconomic status, parents’ educational level and parental smoking behavior are associated with children's SHS exposure.7,8 Interventions to prevent this hazard have not been effective, which demands more research and investment to improve the results of these interventions.9 The current study investigates the association between parents’ educational level and (1) their smoking behavior status, and (2) their children's SHS home exposure.

Methods

During the school year of 2010/2011 a self-administered questionnaire was distributed to 949 students in the 4th grade (mean age 9.56±0.75 years old, range 8–13, 53.4% boys). Participants were from 31 schools randomly selected from all schools of Lisbon District (Portugal). From each selected school, two 4th grade classes were randomly chosen to be included in the study.6

The project and the questionnaire used were approved by the Ministry of Education and by the Schools Board of Directors. Head teachers received guidelines about how to collect parents’ written consent and to administer the questionnaire. Teachers distributed the questionnaires in the classroom supported by a written protocol. Missing parents’ authorization was the main reason for participants lost (nearly 30%).

The questionnaire was developed and validated for this project.6 It includes questions on children's Age and Sex, Fathers’ and Mothers’ Educational level (<10 years, 10–12 years and >12 years-university), Fathers’ and Mothers’ smoking behavior (no-yes) and Children's exposure to SHS at home (no-yes).

Frequencies, contingency tables, chi-squared tests, Cramer's V and simple logistic regression were performed using IBM-SPSS version 22 for Windows.

Results

In the main sample, 42.8% of fathers and 37.6% of mothers smoked, 27.7% of fathers and 25.4% of mothers smoked at home. Regarding only the smokers, 64.8% of fathers and 67.6% of mothers smoked at home exposing their children to SHS hazards.

Data missing in questions about fathers’ and mothers’ educational level was high (between 37.1% and 44.7), but differences between the included and excluded participants in mothers’ and in fathers’ smoking behavior and in children's SHS exposure were not statistically significant.

Relating to this study subsample, 47.4% of fathers and 37.8% of mothers smoked (Table 1). Smoking behavior was associated with educational level of fathers (V=0.14, p=0.005) and mothers (V=0.11, p=0.040). The prevalence of fathers who smoke was high at lowest educational level (54.4%) and low at highest (38.7%). Mothers in the middle educational level had the highest smoking prevalence (43.4%), followed by mothers with lowest educational level (39.9%).

Table 1.

Association between smoking behavior and educational level of father and mother, Lisbon District, Portugal, 2010–2011.

Behavior  n (%)  Educational levelChi-squared p  Cramer's V (p
    ≤9ys
n (%) 
10–12ys
n (%) 
>12ys-Univ.
n (%) 
   
Father (N=525)
Do not smoke  276 (52.6)  118 (45.6)  74 (57.4)  84 (61.3)  0.005  0.141 (0.005) 
Smoke  249 (47.4)  141 (54.4)  55 (42.6)  53 (38.7)     
Mother (N=576)
Do not smoke  358 (62.2)  167 (60.1)  73 (56.6)  118 (69.8)  0.040  0.106 (0.040) 
Smoke  218 (37.8)  111 (39.9)  56 (43.4)  51 (30.2)     

In this subsample, 48.3% of children with fathers who smoke and 47.6% of children with mothers who smoke were exposed to SHS at home (Table 2). Children's SHS exposure was associated with fathers’ (V=0.11, p=0.030) and mothers’ (V=0.13, p=0.010) educational level. The biggest difference in children's SHS exposure was between fathers with low educational level (54.0%) and fathers with middle educational level (42.4%).

Table 2.

Association between children SHS exposition and educational level of father and mother, Lisbon District, Portugal, 2010–2011.

SHS exposition  n (%)  Educational levelChi-squared p  Cramer's V (p
    ≤ 9ys
n (%) 
10–12ys
n (%) 
>12ys-Univ.
n (%) 
   
Father (N=544)
Not exposed  281 (51.7)  125 (46.0)  76 (57.6)  80 (57.1)  0.030  0.114 (0.030) 
Exposed  263 (48.3)  147 (54.0)  56 (42.4)  60 (42.9)     
Mother (N=597)
Not exposed  313 (52.4)  136 (46.6)  72 (54.1)  105 (61.0)  0.010  0.125 (0.010) 
Exposed  284 (47.6)  156 (53.4)  61 (45.9)  67 (39.0)     

Among mothers, the middle educational level category had the highest prevalence of smokers (Table 1). However, the low educational level category had more children exposed to SHS at home (Table 2).

Despite the big difference between fathers and mothers smoking prevalence (respectively, 47.4% and 37.8%, Table 1), the difference in the rate of children exposed to SHS at home by fathers and by mothers was not relevant (respectively, 48.3% and 47.6%, Table 2), suggesting that the rate of smokers who smoke at home is higher amongst mothers.

A simple logistic regression analyses confirmed that fathers and mothers educational level influenced children's SHS exposition (p=0.03 and p=0.010, respectively). Children of fathers and mothers with low educational level were, respectively, 1.57 times more [p=0.032; CIOR(95%)=(1.04;2.37)] and 1.80 times more [p=0.003; CIOR(95%)=(1.23;2.64)] likely to be exposed to SHS at home than children of fathers and mothers with highest educational level.

Discussion

The current study has confirmed (1) the existence of unacceptably high levels of children exposed to SHS in Portuguese homes, (2) in line with published studies, prevalence of smokers is higher amongst parents with low educational level,7,8 and (3) the risk of children's SHS exposure at home increases when parents have a low educational level.8,9 Prevalence of smoking in mothers was lower than in fathers, but the absolute risk of children's SHS exposition at home was similar, suggesting that the rate of smokers who smoke at home is higher amongst mothers. Mothers’ middle educational level category showed the highest prevalence of smokers, indicating that Portugal is still in stage II of the cigarette epidemic model of Lopez et al.10 However, amongst mothers, as amongst fathers, the highest rate of children exposed was found in the category with low educational level.

This study has limitations, namely, data obtained by self-report, using only a subset of the population (4th grade students), the tender age of participants (some may have experienced difficulties answering the questionnaire) and considerable amounts of missing data. Despite these limitations, this study gives a unique contribution to the investigation of child SHS exposure in Portugal. It is relevant to have studies accessing this problem from different sites of the globe to emphasize the need of local and global action to control it.

The current study confirmed the social inequalities associated with smoking. More investment in research and in effective interventions is needed. Parents with low educational level, particularly mothers, should be privileged targets of these interventions.

Ethical disclosuresProtection of human and animal subjects

The authors declare that no experiments were performed on humans or animals for this study.

Confidentiality of data

The authors declare that no patient data appear in this article.

Right to privacy and informed consent

The authors declare that no patient data appear in this article.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank all schools and teachers who collaborated in the study implementation, all children who participated in the study and their families.

This work was supported by FEDER through the Programa Operacional Fatores de Competitividade - COMPETE (FCOMP-01-0124-FEDER-009117), and by FCT - Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (Ref. PTDC/CPECED/098281/2008 and UID/MAT/00212/2013).

References
1
M. Öberg,M.S. Jaakkola,A. Woodward,A. Peruga,A. Prüss-Ustün
Worldwide burden of disease from exposure to second-hand smoke: a retrospective analysis of data from 192 countries
2
World Health Organization
WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2009: implementing smoke-free environments
World Health Organization, (2009)
3
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
The health consequences of involuntary exposure to tobacco smoke: a report of the surgeon general
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Coordinating Center for Health Promotion, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, (2006)
4
R. Chen,A. Clifford,L. Lang,K.J. Anstey
Is exposure to secondhand smoke associated with cognitive parameters of children and adolescents? – A systematic literature review
Ann Epidemiol, 23 (2013), pp. 652-661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2013.07.001
5
J. Leonardi-Bee,M.L. Jere,J. Britton
Exposure to parental and sibling smoking and the risk of smoking uptake in childhood and adolescence: a systematic review and meta-analysis
6
P.D. Vitória,J.C. Machado,A.C. Araújo,S.B. Ravara,C. Samorinha,H. Antunes
Children's exposure to second hand smoke at home: a cross-sectional study in Portugal
Rev Port Pneumol, 21 (2015), pp. 178-184 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rppnen.2014.09.003
7
S. Orton,L.L. Jones,S. Cooper,S. Lewis,T. Coleman
Predictors of children's secondhand smoke exposure at home: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of the evidence
8
J.J. Aurrekoetxea,M. Murcia,M. Rebagliato,M. Guxens,A. Fernández-Somoano,M.J. López
Second-hand smoke exposure in 4-year-old children in Spain: sources, associated factors and urinary cotinine
Environ Res, 145 (2016), pp. 116-125 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2015.11.028
9
L.J. Rosen,V. Myers,M. Hovell,D. Zucker,M. Ben Noach
Meta-analysis of parental protection of children from tobacco smoke exposure
Pediatrics, 133 (2014), pp. 698-714 http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-0958
10
A.D. Lopez,N.E. Collishaw,T. Piha
A descriptive model of the cigarette epidemic in developed countries
Tob Control, 3 (1994), pp. 242-247
Copyright © 2017. Sociedade Portuguesa de Pneumologia
Rev Port Pneumol 2017;23:221-4 - Vol. 23 Num.4 DOI: 10.1016/j.rppnen.2017.02.005